How much aligned funding is your organization unable to pursue?
Know what is worth pursuing. Build the capacity to pursue it.
AutoGrant™ helps organizations uncover aligned funding, make defensible pursuit decisions, and create the capacity to carry approved grant work from requirements through reporting and renewal. AI handles research, structure, drafting, and coordination. Your people retain strategy, relationships, commitments, and approval.
Start free with your organization or a funding priority. See potential matches, then decide what deserves deeper pursuit. No application is submitted without explicit human authorization.
Regional Youth Workforce Innovation Initiative
Eligibility: Confirmed — Applicant type and geography meet the published criteria.
- Mission alignment
- 91/100
- Capacity fit
- 72/100
- Competitive position
- 58/100
- Strategic value
- 86/100
Verdict: Pursue with conditions
Proceed after confirming the data owner, strengthening the employer partnership, and documenting the required match.
Human approval required
Nothing is submitted without explicit sign-off.
Built in your voice
Drafts use your approved organizational context, evidence, and prior work.
Your data stays yours
Customer content is not used to train shared AI models or another customer's workspace.
Full grant lifecycle
Discovery, decision, application, stewardship, reporting, and renewal stay connected.
Start with discovery
See which funding opportunities may fit your organization.
Share your organization's website or describe what you are trying to fund. AutoGrant uses your mission, programs, geography, priorities, and available evidence to surface opportunities for further evaluation.
Initial results are preliminary. Every opportunity must be confirmed against the funder's current eligibility rules, requirements, and source materials.
What a snapshot answers
- Which public and private programs may align with your mission and geography
- The preliminary applicant-type or eligibility signal for each
- Why an opportunity may fit, and what must be confirmed before pursuit
- The source and last-checked date, so you can verify every fact
Free to start. A preliminary match is not an award prediction, and discovery is the beginning of the record, not the whole operation.
The grant capacity gap
Funding opportunity is abundant. Qualified pursuit capacity is not.
Organizations lose funding potential when they cannot see the right opportunities, cannot staff the ones that fit, or commit scarce time before eligibility, readiness, and strategic value are clear.
Opportunities you never see
Your team can monitor only so many public notices, funders, programs, relationships, and funding channels by hand.
Qualified pursuits you cannot staff
Even a strong opportunity goes untouched when requirements, budgets, evidence, writing, review, and coordination exceed available capacity.
Pursuits that should have stopped earlier
An ineligible, low-readiness, or strategically weak pursuit consumes senior time, partner effort, and relationship capital before the decline arrives.
The goal is not more applications. It is more of the right pursuits and fewer expensive mistakes.
From possibility to accountable work
One institutional context. Specialized work. A complete record.
AutoGrant coordinates specialized agents around the organization's approved priorities, programs, evidence, capacity, policies, relationships, and history. Each stage produces structured work the next stage can use, and a record people can inspect.
Watch AutoGrant work
One grant record. Specialized agents. Select a stage to see the work.
Specialized agents
AI Judge · Strategic Planner · Readiness Assessment
Decide what deserves pursuit before the writing starts.
Human checkpoint: a named person approves the pursuit decision before any drafting work begins.
AI Judge scorecard
Regional Youth Workforce Innovation Initiative
Verdict: Pursue with conditions. A no-go is a valuable outcome — it is the cheapest result the system can produce for you.
Shared institutional context — feeds every stage above
The category difference
A list of possibilities is not a funding strategy. A draft is not a grant operation.
AutoGrant connects organizational priorities, opportunity evidence, the pursuit decision, approved work, human review, submission, award obligations, performance, and renewal.
Grant database
Shows what exists, then leaves your team to determine fit, readiness, priority, and next steps.
Generic AI chat
Helps create text, but does not preserve the governed context, decisions, owners, approvals, and obligations around the work.
AutoGrant
Produces an inspectable pursuit decision and carries approved work through a connected institutional record.
The decision before the draft
A match is a possibility. AI Judge determines whether it deserves pursuit.
AI Judge organizes the evidence, tests eligibility and fit, exposes readiness gaps, identifies risks, and shows what must become true before the organization commits scarce capacity.
- Eligibility and threshold requirements
- Mission and program alignment
- Delivery and reporting capacity
- Competitive position
- Strategic value and opportunity cost
- Evidence confidence and readiness conditions
A well-supported no-go is a valuable result. It protects capacity for work with a stronger path to impact and funding.
Regional Youth Workforce Innovation Initiative
Eligibility: Confirmed — Applicant type and geography meet the published criteria.
- Mission alignment
- 91/100
- Capacity fit
- 72/100
- Competitive position
- 58/100
- Strategic value
- 86/100
The funder's youth-workforce priority maps directly to the organization's core program and outcomes.
Delivery is credible, but quarterly reporting needs a named data owner.
Strong local partnerships, with a field likely to include larger prior grantees.
A win would establish evidence and funder history for a larger multi-year opportunity.
Verdict: Pursue with conditions
Proceed after confirming the data owner, strengthening the employer partnership, and documenting the required match.
How AutoGrant and your team divide the work
AI handles the volume. People own the judgment.
AI can research, structure, compare, draft, check, coordinate, and preserve context at a scale a lean team cannot sustain manually. Named people remain responsible for strategy, relationships, program design, facts, evidence, budgets, commitments, exceptions, final review, and submission authorization.
AutoGrant expands professional capacity. It does not outsource institutional accountability.
One connected operation
Discover. Decide. Build. Submit. Steward. Renew.
Every pursuit becomes part of institutional memory: what the organization knew, why it proceeded or passed, who approved the work, what was submitted, what the funder decided, what the award requires, how the program performed, and what should change before renewal.
01Discover
Find public and relationship-driven opportunities aligned to mission, programs, geography, track record, and capacity.
02Decide
Confirm eligibility, evaluate competitive fit, identify risks, and document the go/no-go rationale.
03Build
Convert requirements into a plan, assign inputs, draft in the organization's voice, and review against the funder's criteria.
04Submit
Assemble the complete package, verify requirements, and route final submission through explicit human approval.
05Steward
Turn the award into obligations, owners, milestones, documentation, and reporting dates.
06Renew
Preserve funder history, outcomes, reports, and lessons so the next application begins stronger.
It doesn't stop at the pursuit decision
Most tools help you find and apply. Grant operations continue long after submission.
Before the award
- Discovery and prioritization
- The pursuit decision
- Requirements and work planning
- Narrative and budget development
- Quality review and submission readiness
- Human approval
After the award
- Award obligations and owners
- Reporting dates and compliance
- Budget monitoring
- Funder relationship history
- Outcomes and institutional learning
- Renewal preparation
Choose the operating model
Start with the capacity gap. Match the operating model to the organization.
Some teams need a guided hosted workspace. Others need a managed, organization-wide capability with dedicated infrastructure, integrations, governance, and implementation support. AutoGrant Enterprise is the flagship commercial model.
AutoGrant Enterprise
Organization-wide grant intelligence and operating capacity.
Combine AutoGrant's decision and lifecycle system with organization-specific workflows, named oversight, integrations, governance, and dedicated or customer-controlled deployment options.
Explore EnterpriseAutoGrant Platform
Hosted by AutoGrant. Run by your team.
A guided organization workspace for teams that want a governed grant lifecycle without customer-controlled deployment.
Explore PlatformAutoGrant for Consultants
A professional operating system for distinct client grant pipelines.
Preserve each client's context, voice, evidence, approvals, and reporting history while increasing repeatable professional delivery capacity.
Explore the consultant modelDifferent funding environments
The capacity gap changes by organization. The operating discipline does not.
AutoGrant adapts eligibility, evidence, readiness, workflow, governance, and stewardship to the organization's funding environment while preserving one connected decision and operating record.
Nonprofits
Protect limited development capacity and coordinate program, finance, evidence, and review.
ExploreLocal government
Evaluate project readiness, match, approvals, procurement, delivery, and public accountability.
ExploreRural hospitals and community health
Pursue complex healthcare, workforce, network, and community funding with a lean team.
ExploreResearch institutions and universities
Connect sponsor fit, investigators, budgets, routing, compliance, and resubmission history.
ExploreStartups and SBIR/STTR
Map roadmap milestones to non-dilutive funding and separate real topic fit from keyword fit.
ExploreVenture funds and accelerators
Map portfolio-company milestones to strategically aligned non-dilutive capital across the portfolio.
ExploreEvaluate the work
Do not buy the promise. Inspect the decision and operating artifacts.
AutoGrant is designed to produce work that a grants leader, program owner, finance reviewer, executive, or auditor can inspect. Samples remain clearly labeled until real customer evidence can be published accurately and with permission.
Community Health Workforce Expansion — 47 requirements extracted
| Requirement | Source | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single Audit (2 CFR 200.501) for most recent fiscal year | § IV.B.3 | Finance | Complete |
| Letters of commitment from each named partner | § IV.B.7 | Program | Not started |
| Non-federal match, 25% of total project cost | § III.B | Finance | At risk |
| Logic model with measurable outputs and outcomes | § IV.C.1 | Program | In progress |
| Data management plan covering participant records | § IV.C.4 | IT | Not started |
| SAM.gov registration active through close date | § III.A | Finance | Complete |
Showing 6 of 47. Every requirement links back to the paragraph it came from.
Ineligible — do not pursue
Applicants must be a unit of local government or a federally recognized tribe. A 501(c)(3) may participate only as a named subrecipient.
Found in § III.A, Eligible Applicants — flagged before drafting began.
What would change this
- Apply as a subrecipient under the county health department.
- Wait for the FY27 cycle, which opens the direct-applicant category.
Caught on day one. Roughly 60 hours of drafting not spent.
Submission gate — approval required before anything is filed
- Every factual claim traced to a source document· Program lead
- Budget totals reconcile to the narrative· Finance
- Match commitment confirmed in writing· Finance· outstanding
- Voice matches the organization's prior submissions· Development
Blocked until a named person approves. AutoGrant does not submit on its own.
AI Judge scorecard
A documented pursuit decision with eligibility, fit, readiness, competition, strategic value, risks, and required conditions.
Requirements matrix
Every question, attachment, page limit, budget element, dependency, owner, and deadline extracted from the solicitation.
Funding roadmap
A prioritized view of opportunities, readiness work, relationship actions, and expected application windows.
Human review record
A visible record of who reviewed facts, narrative, budget, compliance, and final authorization.
Award-obligation calendar
Reporting dates, deliverables, owners, outcome measures, financial requirements, and renewal milestones created from the award.
Need AutoGrant inside your environment?
For organizations with deeper governance, integration, or deployment requirements, Enterprise can support dedicated or customer-controlled architecture as part of a managed grant-operating model.
FAQ
The three questions most teams ask first.
Built with real grant teams
Early, active, and transparent about the evidence.
AutoGrant is in active early adoption. Organizations across nonprofit, healthcare, government, research, and innovation are using the system to build pipelines, evaluate opportunities, develop applications, and manage the work.
Grant outcomes arrive on funder timelines. We publish award results only after decisions are complete and customers approve the story. Until then, we prove the product through real workflows, real artifacts, transparent controls, and work you can evaluate before making a larger commitment.
Start with the funding. Build the capability when the value is clear.
Discover opportunities that may align, score one real pursuit, or explore an Enterprise deployment built around your organization.